Run by Vigil Certus on Pontis Systems (Sole Epic LLC) itself, doubling as a real internal readiness upgrade and the working template for client engagements.
Pontis Systems sells recurring services to other small businesses, some of which will eventually ask a version of "how do you protect our data" before signing or renewing, especially as QuoteDrop and Voice Agents clients scale. There's also a standalone driver: this exact gap assessment format is the Dream 100 deliverable used to open conversations with Vigil Certus prospects. Running it on Pontis first means it doubles as a real internal upgrade and a working sample to show prospects.
Rated Present / Partial / Absent based on intake. IG1 has 56 safeguards across 18 controls; this covers the ones most relevant to a solo, cloud-based operation. Safeguards not applicable to a one-person, no-physical-hardware-inventory business are marked accordingly rather than scored.
| Control | Safeguard | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Inventory of Enterprise Assets | Maintain asset inventory | Partial | Devices used to run the business exist but aren't documented anywhere |
| 2. Inventory of Software Assets | Maintain software/SaaS inventory | Absent | No running list of what SaaS tools hold business or client data (Google Workspace, GHL, payment processor, any others) |
| 3. Data Protection | Data inventory and classification | Absent | No documented list of what client data is collected, where it lives, or how long it's retained |
| 3. Data Protection | Encrypt data at rest and in transit | Present (inherited) | Google Workspace and GHL both encrypt in transit and at rest by default; not independently verified or documented |
| 4. Secure Configuration | Secure default configurations | Partial | No documented baseline for account settings across Google Workspace/GHL |
| 5. Account Management | Unique accounts, no shared logins | Present | Solo operator, no shared credentials by default |
| 5. Account Management | Disable dormant/unused accounts | N/A yet | No employees or contractors currently with system access |
| 6. Access Control Management | MFA on all accounts | Present | Confirmed across email, GHL, payment processor |
| 6. Access Control Management | Centralized access control | N/A yet | Solo operator; becomes relevant the moment a VA or contractor is added |
| 7. Vulnerability Management | Patch management | Partial | Cloud SaaS tools patch themselves; no process exists for reviewing third-party app permissions or plugin updates |
| 8. Audit Log Management | Enable and retain audit logs | Partial | Google Workspace and GHL both generate logs by default; nothing is being reviewed or retained intentionally |
| 9. Email/Browser Protections | DNS filtering, anti-phishing | Absent | No DMARC/SPF/DKIM verification confirmed for the business domain, no browser-level protections documented |
| 10. Malware Defenses | Anti-malware on all endpoints | Absent | No confirmed endpoint protection on devices used to run the business |
| 11. Data Recovery | Automated backups, tested recovery | Absent | No documented backup of GHL data, client records, or business documents outside of vendor-side retention |
| 14. Security Awareness Training | Security awareness program | Absent | None needed yet for solo operation, but becomes a real requirement the moment a contractor or VA is added |
| 15. Service Provider Management | Inventory and assess service providers | Absent | No documented list of vendors with access to client or business data (Google, GHL, payment processor, any others) |
| 17. Incident Response Management | Written incident response plan | Absent | No plan exists for what happens if an account is compromised or data is exposed |
The two encouraging findings: MFA is genuinely in place everywhere, which is the single highest-leverage control and the one most solo operators skip. And the core platforms (Google Workspace, GHL) provide strong baseline encryption and logging by default, so the underlying infrastructure isn't the weak point.
The real gap is documentation and process, not technology. Nothing here requires buying new tools. It requires writing down what already exists, adding backups, and building the two or three processes that matter most before they're urgently needed, specifically before adding a contractor or VA, and before a client or partner asks for proof.
Do first (this month, low effort, highest leverage):
Do next (before adding any contractor or VA):
Do before it's asked for (positions Pontis/Vigil ahead of a client or partner request):
Once the items above are complete, the following should be kept on file and easy to produce on request:
Note on use as a Dream 100 artifact: This same structure, intake through remediation roadmap, is what gets run for a real prospect: swap the entity details, adjust for actual team size and stack, and the format holds. The gap between "informal but reasonably careful solo operator" (this result) and "documented, evidence-ready operator" is exactly the gap Vigil Certus sells closing.